tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-798304669345796302.post8569409581834410045..comments2024-02-12T13:39:03.138+00:00Comments on Hosiery For Men: Reviewed: ITEM m6 Beauty TightsHosiery For Menhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12140889008055624236noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-798304669345796302.post-46793653732878097022020-04-09T17:11:30.933+01:002020-04-09T17:11:30.933+01:00I agree that Falke (e.g. Pure Matt 100) has greate...I agree that Falke (e.g. Pure Matt 100) has greater stretch and length accommodation than Item M6 L+/L2 (and in my experience, Wolford). I'm 6'(183cm), 219 lbs (99kg), waist 39" with muscular thighs. However, it depends upon the style. I find the Beauty Tights to have rather high compression compared to the Opaque Tights and it was a bit of a struggle to get them into position at the waist. They do relax a little after wearing for a while, but for my physique I don't consider them having a generous fit. Had to pull up the waist a few times. Regarding the Opaque tights, the waist accommodation is generous and leg length feels like it has about 1" more on the Beauty Tights. My feeling is that if I was 5'11" and 199 lbs (89kg) I would be content with the fit.T4Mhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09351136696921371949noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-798304669345796302.post-37145356177299135242016-09-29T22:04:46.021+01:002016-09-29T22:04:46.021+01:00Sorry, I think this is not correct. I`am male and ...Sorry, I think this is not correct. I`am male and my size in length is 6 feet (183cm). My Waist is 34" and my Hip-Size is 40". I have the Item M6 in the size L2 and M, not L or L+. This size is comparable with Falke Leg Energizer in Size L. I tried some other size with L2 and L, but it was too large at the hip.<br />Size L2 in Length and L+ in Waist and Hip? Kim Kardashian would like it, but your Hip is really over 48" (122 cm)??Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-798304669345796302.post-82310886003825893232016-09-27T08:34:47.759+01:002016-09-27T08:34:47.759+01:00In a word 'no'. Leg length is significantl...In a word 'no'. Leg length is significantly shorter even in the largest ITEM m6 size but the tights do have plenty of stretch. I would say that for guys 5'10" is likely to be the limit.Hosiery For Menhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12140889008055624236noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-798304669345796302.post-80886462459746113282016-09-26T21:43:44.478+01:002016-09-26T21:43:44.478+01:00Is length comparable to that of Wolford/Falke?Is length comparable to that of Wolford/Falke?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com